Skip to content

Does Rhode Island need outside economic intervention?

May 8, 2012

Although the worst of the Great Recession was yet to come, Rhode Island’s decades-long struggle to build a better economy was abundantly clear by the time when I wrote a Providence Phoenix story on the subject in March 2008.

The piece outlined the various symptoms of the problem and efforts to improve it. It closed with URI economics professor Leonard Lardaro’s view that Rhode Island was past the point where it could solve its own problems.

Four years have passed, and local signs of economic distress have only worsened. So I asked Lardaro for an updated view on whether Rhode Island can fix itself.

My first question was what the last four years show about the ability of elected officials to address the situation. Lardaro says, in his view, their inaction has failed to move the state toward a better long-term economic performance:

In spite of a very severe crisis, where the global economy flirted with depression, Rhode Island made very few changes to either eliminate or moderate its major structural deficiencies, other than occasional lip service …. Most notably, the cost of doing business here (taxes + fees + regulations + electricity costs + skills of our labor force) remain about as non-competitive as they have been for quite some time.

This state’s greatest deficiency, the lack of skills possessed by our labor force, has been sustained and even exacerbated by the dozen-year defunding of public higher education, which has made tuition ever-more expensive, placing the skills required to make our state’s labor force more competitive farther out of the reach of our residents. Fees and regulations also remain a problem, even though we supposedly have made inroads into making regulations less burdensome.

On a related note, Josh Barro, nudged along by Ted Nesi, recently wrote in Forbes on the question of whether Rhode Island needs economic union with Connecticut. Barro found Rhode Islanders are poorer, but pay higher taxes and make lower public expenditures than our counterparts in Connecticut and Massachusetts.

Back to Lardaro. Like Barro, he believes structural weaknesses are holding Rhode Island back:

Since due diligence is virtually non-existent in Rhode Island, an in-depth analysis is needed to identify both our strengths and weaknesses before we can “reinvent” our state’s economy through significant structural changes …. I therefore believe we need to either institutionalize  due diligence here, or hire outside consulting firms to perform the analysis for us and to make recommendations for legislative changes.

Lardaro recommends following political changes as prerequisites for necessary economic changes:

(1)    Have a full-time legislature;

(2)    Dramatically reduce the size of the legislature to about 50 persons;

(3)    Institute four-year terms for the legislature;

(4)    Have term limits of two (four-year) terms;

(5)    Give the governor a line item veto authority; and

(6)    Earmark all revenues generated by increases in taxes or fees to investment-oriented uses.

In tandem, these ideas seem unlikely to find legislative favor. Yet just as I wrote in 2008, the onus remains on elected officials to prove critics such as Lardaro wrong.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. SGH permalink
    May 8, 2012 6:03 pm

    Personally, if reducing the size of the legislature also means collapsing it to a unicameral system, I could be down with that (though I’d prefer just collapsing everyone into one chamber and making it slightly more parliamentary; not that parliaments are more functional than the GA).

  2. Mister Guy permalink
    May 9, 2012 1:01 am

    “(1) Have a full-time legislature”

    I wouldn’t have a problem with this…if the RI Legislature wasn’t so corrupt. We’d probably have to pay them more than we do now as “part-timers” if we did this though.

    “(2) Dramatically reduce the size of the legislature to about 50 persons”

    RI has more State Senators than VT (which has less than half the population of RI). RI also mirrors VT in that it doesn’t have a longer term for Senators than for Representatives, which is silly. I’d agree with “SGH” above that a unicameral system would be best for RI…with maybe the same number of members that the RI House has right now (?). If it works for Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Montenegro, New Zealand, Norway, Saint Kitts & Nevis, Singapore, Slovakia, Sweden, the British Virgin Islands, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the provinces of Canada, the territories of Australia, the Northern Ireland Assembly, the Scottish Parliament & the National Assembly for Wales…it can work in RI.

    “(3) Institute four-year terms for the legislature”

    This is a great idea.

    “(4) Have term limits of two (four-year) terms”

    I basically disagree with term limits for legislatures. Having a large new batch of legislators every number of years leads to the power of lobbyists growing over time. We need less corruption in RI…not more.

    “(5) Give the governor a line item veto authority”

    I’d actually be willing to try this out in RI.

    “(6) Earmark all revenues generated by increases in taxes or fees to investment-oriented uses.”

    I don’t know that *all* increases in revenue should be delegated to this aim in RI.

    RI’s not going to join up with either MA or CT…that’s just a pipe-dream, since there’s virtually nothing in it for either of those states to gain in a merger of almost any kind.

    As for high electricity costs, how about breaking up the monopoly that National Grid has in RI?? Electricity deregulation was an absolute failure here.

Trackbacks

  1. Governor Chafee On RI: “We’ve Hit Rock Bottom”
  2. The US is reinventing its economy; can Rhode Island do likewise? « On Politics

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,262 other followers

%d bloggers like this: