Skip to content

Where is the RI GOP on 38 Studios?

October 12, 2012

Rhode Island Republican General Assembly candidates have a great issue this year. RIPR political analyst Scott MacKay wonders why they aren’t using it.

If ever there was a case study in what ails the Democrats who have run Smith Hill for eons, it is the 38 Studios video game fiasco.

It is foolish to even ask what was right about this flawed, indeed desperate, lunge at growing jobs in a state in dire need of   them.

Unless you have been living in a yurt for the past year, you by now know many of the gory details. Then Gov. Donald Carcieri, the state Economic Development Corporation and the Democrats who run the Assembly combined in 2010 to bet $75 million of taxpayers money on a 38 Studios, the video-game company run by retired Red Sox pitching star Curt Schilling.

Less than two years later, the company went belly-up, leaving Rhode Island taxpayers on the hook for as much as $102 million in state-guaranteed bonds.

Worse, all the major players in the deal went into virtual hiding. Carcieri was in his silent retirement bunker for months, leaving only to do one television interview. House Speaker Gordon Fox, D-Providence and Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed, D-Newport have both resisted calls for a legislative investigation into 38 Studios. Fox says he doesn’t want a look-back while litigation and bankruptcy proceedings, and perhaps a criminal inquiry, are underway. Paiva Weed is doing her best imitation of an ostrich with her head in the sand.

Republican State Sen. Dawson Hodgson of North Kingstown asked for a legislative investigation. He was rebuffed by Sen. James Sheehan, a North Kingstown Democrat, who happens to be chairman of the Senate’s Government Oversight Committee. Sheehan, who rarely misses a chance for publicity, was unusually mum about this request. Sheehan said conducting hearings “during a politically charged campaign season could do more harm than good.’’

Just what planet are these people living on. Maybe Hodgson said it best. “The only thing you can conclude is that the General Assembly doesn’t want the public looking at them’’ Referring to the State House, Hodgson said, “You walk around that building and it’s like this never happened.’’

Lawmakers ought to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time. There is plenty of precedent for legislative oversight and action even when a criminal and civil litigation is occurring. Do any of these people remember the Teitz Commission that probed the credit union collapse in the 1990s while federal and state criminal investigations were proceeding?

Let’s assume that it was wise in 2010 for the Assembly to put $125 million in taxpayer-backed loans into local businesses at a time when our state had one of the nation’s highest jobless rates. But you don’t need to be an MBA to wonder why the governor, the EDC and the Assembly would then bet 60 percent of that money, $75 million,  on one risky venture run by a ballplayer with no business record.

If  Fox, Paiva Weed or Carcieri were investing their own money, does anyone really think they would have done this? Carcieri had a career as a banker; would he ever have made this loan were he still at Old Stone Bank? Does anybody planning investments for their future take 60 percent of their money and bet it on a business like 38 Studios?

Any why was such important legislation held until the middle of the night in the waning days of the Assembly session? What did the leadership know about the deal that they didn’t tell their members?

The only lawmaker who voted against the 38 Studios enabling legislation was former Republican House leader Robert Watson of East Greenwich. Where were the other Republicans?

Now, Republican State Chairman Mark Zaccaria says the party hasn’t used the 38 Studios disaster in a coordinated campaign manner statewide because it is a complicated, murky topic that doesn’t fit on a bumper sticker.

But voters are paying attention. Pawtucket Democrat Patrick O’Neill, who represents a district anchored by Oak Hill, has resigned from the House leadership. One of the reasons: He was peppered with negative comments on 38 Studios from voters in his primary campaign last month.

If  Republicans are serious about winning some Assembly seats and loosening the Democratic State House grip, they better start talking about 38 Studios. (The state GOP ought to go back to the future: In 1983 they made huge inroads in a special June state Senate election by running against a gerrymandered Democratic redistricting law). Republicans only have three weeks to gain traction on an issue that’s a winner.

 

Scott MacKay’s commentary can be heard every Monday on Morning Edition at 6:45 and 8:45. You can also follow his analysis and political reporting at our `On Politics’ blog at RIPR.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 Comments leave one →
  1. Jill D permalink
    October 12, 2012 3:21 pm

    Independent Mark Binder is definitely making an issue of this in his contest with Gordon Fox in House District 4. Keep up the pressure, Mark!

  2. A pro "term limits" advocator permalink
    October 12, 2012 11:35 pm

    Mark Binder should not be alone in putting pressure on the General Assembly for the 38 Studio disaster. The district voters of the other GA Democratic leadership people like Paiva Weed, Mattiello, Helio Melo, DaPonte, etc., should also be applying pressure on these lawmakers. They were all in on this fiasco deal making together. And they should be held accountable but the voters will vote them back in. These voters think these people are the greatest lawmakers since sliced bread and put them back into office probably for favors they receive. WHy else would someone vote for a lawmaker who has done disastorus things to the economy of the state unless they are getting paid off by having some personal favor done for them. This is what is wrong. Some lawmaker solves
    the constituent’s problem, whatever it may be (from a zoining or neighbor complaint to some major neighborhood issue) and the constituent thinks he is indebted to this politician for life. Not so.
    The Paiva Weed Newport district, the Mattiello Cranston district, the districts of all who had a part in this, should be voted out on Nov 6th which is 4 weeks away. Will it happen? Will we see the leadership gone? Will voters finally make that decision and vote for the new person- the fresh face- the beginner with no ties to cronyism and deal making?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: